How One Should Photograph Sculpture
translated from Heinrich Wölfflin, ‘Wie man Skulpturen aufnehmen soll’, Zeitschrift für bildende Kunst, n. s. 7, 1896, 224-28;n. s. 8, 1897, 294-97; 2018
Despite the widespread use of photographs in art historical studies in the second half of the nineteenth century, art historians' attitudes toward photographic reproductions have been wavering. Proponents believed that the photograph was to art history what the microscope was to natural science, its true scientific foundation; opponents feared that the passivity of mechanical reproductions could lead to an intellectual degradation. Heinrich Wölfflin, the famous Swiss art historian, also took part in this discussion. He did not reject photography as a new form of contemplation in the development of mass culture, and even developed a natural-science-like method of working in art history on this basis. However, the arbitrariness of the photographs circulating on the market and the aesthetic degradation they implied were heavily criticized by him, as he illustrated in two successive articles in the Journal of Visual Arts (Zeitschrift für bildende Kunst) in 1896/97.
《如何拍摄雕塑》
译自Heinrich Wölfflin, ‘Wie man Skulpturen aufnehmen soll’, Zeitschrift für bildende Kunst, n. s. 7, 1896, 224-28;n. s. 8, 1897, 294-97; 2018
尽管十九世纪下半叶照片在艺术史研究中的使用已经十分普遍,艺术史家们对于摄影复制品的态度却一直摇摆不定。支持者认为照片对于艺术史就像显微镜对于自然科学一样,是其真正的科学基础;反对者却担心机械复制品的被动性会导致一种智力上的退化。瑞士著名艺术史家海因里希·沃尔夫林[Heinrich Wölfflin]也参与了这一讨论。作为大众文化发展浪潮中一种新的私密静观的方式,他并不拒绝摄影技术,甚至在此基础上发展了一种自然科学般的艺术史工作方法。但是市场流通照片的随意性以及其所暗示的审美堕落却遭到了他的猛烈批判。1896/97年间,他在《视觉艺术杂志》( Zeitschrift für bildende Kunst)上连续发表了两篇文章来说明这一问题。